These aren’t the droids you’re looking for

It is sometimes funny to see what google combinations have brought visitors to the site. We just got a hit on our old-version blogger blog (we moved to MT three weeks ago, and will eventually dismantle the old site) from the following Google search:

“topless alberta statutes”

This is particularly odd because none of the words in that search are on the old site! I was sufficiently puzzled that I re-ran the search in Google, and didn’t see any link to the site — but that’s definitely the referrer on a hit from this very afternoon. Odd.

4 comments for “These aren’t the droids you’re looking for

  1. December 10, 2003 at 7:15 pm

    BTW – regarding the story on the old site. The miniseries does indeed have people in their garments — including tokens from what I could see. Here’s a link to a picture from the HBO site. (Note: shows woman in her cotton garments which don’t exactly hide nipples too well as we married folks know)

  2. Adam Greenwood
    December 10, 2003 at 7:17 pm

    Some think that topless Alberta statutes, while immoral, shouldn’t be against the law. I disagree.

  3. Kaimi
    December 10, 2003 at 7:58 pm

    Thanks for the link, Clark. A link to a see-through top is probably most appropriate in the comments to this particular post, since it is about topless laws. :)

  4. December 10, 2003 at 8:04 pm

    That’s strange… but not as strange as my recent referral from a search for “Nannies and curses in memphis”. :^/

Comments are closed.