Another Bloggernacking Opportunity of Sorts

Steve wants some fresh ideas for BCC, and he’s willing to let the best idea(s) be posted there. What does this mean? Simply that the time has never been better to polish up that ten-page masterpiece on the hidden connection between the King Follett Discourse, the Adam-God Theory, and Zelph, and then notify Steve. Perhaps your name will be on the next BCC post! (Details over at BCC).

*Alternatively, Steve invites us all to tell him what functionality he needs to add to his blog. Fish, meet barrel.

6 comments for “Another Bloggernacking Opportunity of Sorts

  1. D. Fletcher
    June 9, 2004 at 1:21 pm

    Shocking news, but I have a board of my own.

    It’s a public site, but you will have to register before you can participate.

    It’s just a group, called Sondheim and Us, where we discuss musicals, music, movies, and anything else that suits our fancy. Though small, we are getting about 20 posts a day.

    It isn’t specifically LDS, but that’s probably a good thing — my eyes are blogged from reading all these LDS blogs.

  2. June 9, 2004 at 3:23 pm

    Actually, the big prize isn’t getting your name on a BCC post. Heck, ANYBODY can do that. No, the real prize is a Google email account, that most treasured of accounts.

  3. lyle
    June 9, 2004 at 3:37 pm

    which are free? which since, economists say “nothing is free,” … is the real value, right steve? isn’t that the punchline of a mastercard commercial after all?

    shutting an economist (or showing the economist)
    up? … priceless

  4. June 9, 2004 at 3:51 pm

    lyle, of course they’re free! Go out and get one, then. If you don’t already have one, you probably won’t get one until they go public with it.

  5. Jennifer J
    June 10, 2004 at 2:22 am

    Gee, Steve, ‘ANYBODY can do that?’ I feel so diminished…the luster and pride of having my name on the list, and my own posts…it all seems so meaningless now! *sniff, sniff* I guess my un-special self will just have to deal with this, somehow, eventually. :-((

    [I guess I could just contribute more, eh? Is that the secret agenda behind the contest?]

  6. June 10, 2004 at 10:47 am

    Secret agenda?? Why, whatever do you mean?

Comments are closed.