Book Reviews: Juvenile Non-Fiction

If you are an adult, inevitability comes in the form of death and taxes. If you are a child, it comes as the middle school research project.

This means that there is an entire genre of books geared to children of that reading and maturity level on the entire spectrum of possible paper topics. And this, in turn, means a handful of titles about the Church. I want to review some of these books since they will be, for perhaps thousands of children, their first exposure to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Book Cover

Mormonism by Corinne J. Naden and Rose Blue

The first thing we have to grapple with here is the cover, which is a scene from the Hill Cumorah pageant. I wish they had chosen something else since this shot conveys the impression that Mormons spend their time wearing klan robes and blowing on really long trumpets. The same picture is reproduced inside the book, where a caption noting that “Mormons believe that humans are potential gods” only makes it weirder. The idea of human deification is mentioned at least a half dozen times in this book; by contrast, there are virtually no references to Jesus Christ.

Of course, members, sympathizers, and antis will have different opinions as to what constitutes an appropriate emphasis for a book on the Church. But errors of fact are quite a different matter and this book is riddled with them. Here are some things that children will find in this book:

–Church members use ‘thee’ and ‘thou’ in talks.
–The church forbids interracial dating marriage.
–“The church itself is governed exclusively by Americans.”
–The infamous (and retracted) statement that “when our leaders speak, the thinking has been done.”
–The church threatens to excommunicate those who don’t pay their tithing.
–“The family home evening is an example of how the Mormon Church controls most private aspects of life.”
–“Members [of the Relief Society] often serve as home-visiting teachers.”
–Women are discouraged but not forbidden to serve as Sunday School presidents.
–The Book of Mormon is a history of people “who had lived in Central America thousands of years before the time of Jesus.”
–“At the temple baptism ceremony, the person standing for the dead is ritually washed, anointed with oil, and dressed in white temple garments.”
–A picture showing an LDS couple with their food storage is tagged “Mormons take practical steps to prepare for the millenium.”
–Seminary consists of “after-school study classes.” (Don’t they wish!)
–An endowment is performed “once in a lifetime.”
–“Finally, they go to the celestial room, where presumably the actual [endowment] ceremony is performed.”
–A reference in the section on MoTab to “the temple’s magnificent organ.”
–References to “celestial heaven” and “Relief Society of Women.”
–The chapter on Mormon doctrine has virtually no mention of Christ, but subsections titled “Polygamy,” “The Millenium,” and “A Clannish People,” where we learn that “the general belief is that if a non-Mormon family moves next door to a Mormon family, the newcomers will be treated kindly, but they will never be more than casual neighbors.”

The structure of the book is also frustrating, as it shuttles between a historical narrative and sections on people and doctrine. This means that some topics are mentioned repeatedly, such as–of course–polygamy. And while Joseph Smith and Brigham Young get a few chapters, one gets the sense that the Mormons haven’t done anything in the 20th or 21st centuries. In other words, this book is not so much about “Mormonism” as it is “19th Century Mormon History.”

GRADE: D+ I did not think they were hostile so much as they were misinformed. Each of the authors is credited with dozens of children’s books; neither is an expert on the Church. It seems a pity that they couldn’t have asked one real member to review the book; so many little mistakes and, perhaps, big problems of emphasis could have been fixed.

Book Cover

Mormon Faith in America by Maxine Hanks and Jean Kinney Williams

One would have thought that with an actual (albiet former: Hanks was one of the ‘September 6’) Mormon as the author, there would be fewer errors in this book than in Mormonism. Surprisingly, this is not the case; here are some things that your neighborhood middle school student will learn from this book:

–The Nauvoo temple was “the first temple built by early members of the church.” (Later on, a picture of the Kirtland Temple is labelled the first temple.)
–Lesbian and gay members are “excommunicated when they reveal their sexual orientation.”
–A patriarchal blessing is given by “a patriarch or elder.”
–The dedication of graves is one of the temple ceremonies.
–CES has offered elementary and secondary education in underserved areas since 1977 (actually since the late 19th century) and “it now operates about 10,000 elementary or secondary schools.”
–Missionaries serve in “over 200 countires” ( lists 141 countries; while it is debatable, most sources list the total number of countries in the world as about 193). Similarly, there are LDS congregations in “more than 200 countries.”
–From a timeline under the year 1852: “a revelation that polygamy is no longer to be practiced is announced publicly.”
–“Missionaries are discouraged from watching television.” (You can just see it, can’t you: “But President–it’s only discouraged!”)
–RMs get a tuition discount at BYU.
–Pioneer Day is “like Christmas and the Fourth of July in one.”
–Family Home Evening means “shar[ing] a meal and perhaps scripture readings together.”
–President Hinckley has a “program” to “further integrate the LDS Church into the mainstream and has called upon members and observers alike to stop referring to the Church as Mormons or even Latter-day Saints, but simply as the Church of Jesus Christ.”
–Mormons never practiced polyandry.

There are also numerous typographical errors: “Jeredites,” “nearly 112 million members worldwide,” “Thurim and Umim,” and “the national tragedy [on] September 11, 2002.”

You can see the hand of not only a Mormon but a Mormon intellectual in this book. When she introduces the Book of Mormon, she describes it thus: “The book was said to have been inspired by God, with the gold plates being used as a sort of code-breaker that enabled Smith to decipher the word of God, as given to him by the angel.” That’s a definition only a liberal Mormon could love! Similarly, the subsection “Women and the Mormon Priesthood” is precisely the same size as “Mormon Priesthood,” which is an allocation of attention that only a liberal could love. Hanks writes that “women share in the priesthood with their husbands, and they perform women’s priesthood rites in the temples. Mormon women in the 19th century participated more in priesthood functions–such as blessings and healings–were ordained to offices, and presided over the women’s Relief Society.” Later, the book notes that “blessings are also given for those who are ill or in need, or by a father or mother.” On a timeline with less than 20 dates, we learn that in 1930 “women’s blessings and ordinances are forbidden.” (The perceptive reader will note that this contradicts the previous data points.)

GRADE: D+ Like Mormonism, this text becomes terribly confusing and redundant as it alternates between historical and theological topics. This title does do a better job (but only slightly) on 20th century church history. The definitions for LDS terms in the sidebar are also helpful. But the errors and misrepresentations are disturbing, especially coming from an author who should know better.

Book Cover

The Mormons by Jean Kinney Williams

Interestingly, Jean Kinney Williams is listed as the second author on the Hanks book. But this book is an entirely different beast. What is most notable is that the prose is substantially better: it reads like a story, not a textbook. That alone is enough to recommend it. There are very few questionable lines (the worst I could find was: “Joseph said that The Book of Mormon, with its story of the ancient band of Israelites who fled to the New World, contained all the information necessary about how the church was to be structured in modern times.”) and no obvious errors. The book feels even-handed. It doesn’t sound like it came out of correlation, but neither does it read as if the author is only shallowly acquainted with the Saints or has a deeper need to ax-grind. While it is limited, as the other books are, to black and white illustrations and photos, the pictures are sharp and interesting. And the book doesn’t alternate between doctrine and history like the other titles do: it proceeds strictly chronologically and therefore flows much more smoothly. But this means that there is very little in the book about current church practice; “A History of the Mormons” would have been a better title. But the summary of “Mormon life” that she squeezes into a few brief pages at the end is not only error-free and surprisingly successful at capturing the feel of the church, but also interesting. Instead of simply giving a laundry list of Church programs, she explains them through the lens of the life of one LDS family. This is an excellent book.

GRADE: A Even-handed and accurate.

Book Cover

I Am a Latter-day Saint (Mormon) by Gayla Wise

To be fair: this book is an entirely different genre from the last three; it is aimed at emergent readers, perhaps a first-grader learning about individual differences. Our family has read several titles from this series (I Am a Hindu, I Am Jewish, I Am Muslim) and they are charming. Since they are written from the point of view of a child who is an adherent, they have a sweetness about them that is unparalleled: “My favorite part of the Book of Mormon is when Jesus visits the people of the Americas right after his death and resurrection.” I was very pleased to see that, after a brief introduction, the very next page was a statement about Jesus Christ. This book is nearly perfect in every way: it covers basic doctrine and lifestyle, it is fair, and the emphasis is right. I think all Saints would recognize their church in this book and feel that they had been fairly treated. This would be a good title to read to LDS children, to share with a nonmember neighbor, or to donate to your elementary school’s library.

GRADE: A+ I can’t really think of any way to improve on this book.

A final note:

All three of the books geared to middle school students addressed polygamy at length, as well as other elements of Church history that don’t make it through correlation. I’m working through in my mind the ramifications of a good little Mormon kid who decides to do a research report on the Church (“It’ll be a missionary opportunity when I do my class presentation!”) and finds on page 20 that Joseph Smith married a sixteen-year-old girl who lived in his home in Kirtland and then lied publicly about his marriages. Even more cringe-inducing is the thought of a Primary-age child reading the descriptions (some accurate, some not) of the temple ceremony in the Naden and Hanks books. This is more food for thought in the ongoing discussion of the best way to approach the more complicated issues in Church history.

11 comments for “Book Reviews: Juvenile Non-Fiction

  1. Frank McIntyre
    July 7, 2006 at 3:17 pm

    I’m glad for the positive recommendations, but it sure is odd to see books put out with what seem like pretty obvious errors.

  2. Ed Johnson
    July 7, 2006 at 5:12 pm

    I agree it’s too bad about all the errors, but I’m too cynical to think it’s “odd.”

    Julie, what do you know about the market for books such as these? My impression is they are meant to be sold to school libraries as part of a set of books on religions of the world. My other guess is that standards are pretty low in this market.

  3. Jonathan Green
    July 7, 2006 at 5:29 pm

    Julie, one thing I’d like to see in your reviews is the name of the publisher, which for juvenile non-fiction is probably equally important, at least, as the name of the author. The number of pages in the books would be nice, too. Apart from that small matter, thanks very much for these reviews.

  4. Brenda
    July 8, 2006 at 12:50 am

    \”“The book was said to have been inspired by God, with the gold plates being used as a sort of code-breaker that enabled Smith to decipher the word of God, as given to him by the angel.â€? That’s a definition only a liberal Mormon could love! Similarly, the subsection “Women and the Mormon Priesthoodâ€? is precisely the same size as “Mormon Priesthood,â€? which is an allocation of attention that only a liberal could love.\”

    Your attributes to liberal Mormons are interesting.

    On the other hand, how can we expect non-members (authors included) to deal with historical information about Joseph Smith’s polygamy practices appropriately when we don’t know what to do with this information ourselves?

    Good reviews! Thank you.

  5. July 8, 2006 at 4:05 am

    queer lds members are excommunicated

  6. Adam Greenwood
    July 8, 2006 at 4:31 am

    Nope. If by ‘queer’ you mean ‘having a same-sex orientation.’

  7. July 8, 2006 at 9:37 am

    fair cop, i still think that sexual orientation reflects sexual behaviour and one can get exed for that. (though, wasnt quinn exed for speaking about same gendered issues, but not “acting on it” ?)

  8. Julie M. Smith
    July 8, 2006 at 10:19 am

    President Gordon B. Hinckley has said: “As I said from this pulpit one year ago, our hearts reach out to those who refer to themselves as gays and lesbians. We love and honor them as sons and daughters of God. They are welcome in the Church.” (“Why We Do Some of the Things We Do,â€? Ensign, Nov. 1999, 54).

  9. July 11, 2006 at 3:04 pm

    You can see the hand of not only a Mormon but a Mormon intellectual in this book.

    Not by the definitions I use. An intellectual is, first and foremost, someone who gets the facts right.

  10. Gayla Wise
    October 24, 2006 at 1:08 pm

    Thank you for the A+ review of my book. Maybe you can tell – this is one book about the Church actually written by a member of the Church.

  11. Julie M. Smith
    October 24, 2006 at 1:46 pm

    Thanks for your comment, Gayla, and thank you for your book.

Comments are closed.